The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has defended its recent actions, insisting that its compliance with a court ruling was in line with constitutional provisions, while rejecting calls for the removal of its chairman.
In a statement issued in Abuja, the commission said its decision was guided strictly by the need to uphold the rule of law, following a judgment by the Court of Appeal on a political party dispute.
INEC maintained that adherence to judicial pronouncements is a constitutional obligation, stressing that failure to comply would amount to a violation of due process and could undermine Nigeria’s democratic framework.
The commission further described calls for the removal of its chairman as unconstitutional, noting that the process for appointing and removing the head of the electoral body is clearly outlined in the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
It emphasised that the chairman does not serve at the discretion of any individual, political party, or interest group, adding that any attempt to force such removal outside legal provisions threatens the independence of the commission.
The electoral body also cautioned against the politicisation of its decisions, warning that such actions could erode public trust in the electoral system and weaken democratic institutions.
INEC reiterated its commitment to neutrality, transparency, and fairness in the discharge of its constitutional responsibilities, assuring Nigerians that it remains focused on delivering credible elections.
The development follows criticism from some political stakeholders who questioned the commission’s role in recent party leadership issues and called for accountability.
Observers say the situation highlights ongoing tensions between political actors and electoral authorities, particularly as preparations intensify for future elections in the country.
