A government-appointed commission in Bangladesh has revealed that at least 287 people are presumed to have been killed in enforced abductions during the rule of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, according to its final report submitted to the interim government on Sunday.
The Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances, established after a nationwide uprising toppled Hasina’s administration in August 2024, investigated 1,569 cases of abductions.
After verification, the panel concluded that 287 victims are likely dead, while many others were unlawfully detained or remain missing.
The commission said evidence indicates some corpses were dumped in rivers, including the Buriganga in the capital Dhaka, or buried in unmarked mass graves.
Commission member Nur Khan Liton told AFP that officials identified several locations where bodies were presumably buried, and recommended that authorities engage forensic experts to identify remains and preserve DNA samples for families.
According to the final report, security forces operated under the command of Hasina and senior government officials during the 15-year period of her rule.
A significant number of the abducted were linked to political opposition, including members of the Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP).
In December 2025, police began exhuming a mass grave in Dhaka connected to the uprising against Hasina, uncovering at least eight bodies with bullet wounds, the Criminal Investigation Department chief said.
The United Nations has estimated that up to 1,400 people were killed in crackdowns during Hasina’s attempts to retain power amid mass protests in 2024.
In November 2025, Hasina was sentenced to death in absentia for crimes against humanity related to the violent suppression of dissent.
Reactions and Aftermath The inquiry’s findings have intensified calls for accountability and justice in a nation still grappling with the legacy of political violence.
Families of victims have welcomed the report as a step toward truth, but also urged swift trials of security personnel and political figures implicated in abuses.
The interim government, led by Chief Adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus, has pledged to pursue investigation and reforms to prevent future abuses.
Some human rights analysts note that the total number of disappearances could be far higher than documented, due to underreporting and fear among victims’ families.
United States President, Donald Trump, has announced what he described as the capture of Venezuelan President, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores.
Trump made the claim on Friday in a statement circulated via his media platform, asserting that Maduro and his wife were taken into custody following what he called a “successful international security operation.”
According to Trump, the operation was allegedly carried out with the cooperation of unnamed international partners, adding that the development marked “a major turning point” in efforts to address the political and humanitarian crisis in Venezuela.
“Maduro and his wife have been captured,” Trump said, without providing details on the location, timing, or the authority under which the arrest was made.
As of the time of filing this report, there has been no official confirmation from the United States government, Venezuelan authorities, or international law enforcement agencies regarding the claim.
The Venezuelan government has also not issued any statement responding to Trump’s announcement. Attempts to reach officials of the Venezuelan presidency for comments were unsuccessful.
Political analysts described the claim as extraordinary and unprecedented, noting that the capture of a sitting foreign president would require formal acknowledgment by recognised state or international institutions.
Observers further cautioned that Trump, who is no longer in office, does not possess executive authority to order or announce such actions on behalf of the U.S. government.
Venezuela has been gripped by prolonged political tension, economic hardship and international sanctions, with President Maduro facing longstanding accusations of human rights abuses and electoral manipulation, allegations his administration has consistently denied.
The situation remains fluid, and source will continue to monitor developments and provide updates as more information becomes available.
U.S. President Donald Trump issued a stark warning to the Islamic Republic of Iran on Friday, following days of violent unrest that have erupted across the country over soaring living costs and a collapsingTrump Warns Iran Over Deadly Unrest, Says U.S. “Locked And Loaded” To Aid Protesters national currency.
The protests — which began as demonstrations against inflation and currency instability — have turned deadly and drawn sharp international attention.
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said that if Iranian security forces “shoot and violently kill peaceful protesters,” the United States would “come to their rescue” and that Washington was “locked and loaded and ready to go.”
Trump’s comments marked one of the most direct U.S. threats toward Tehran since the unrest began late last month, as protests spread from Tehran to other cities including Isfahan, Lorestan and the western provinces.
The wave of popular demonstrations has been fuelled by a sharp depreciation of the Iranian rial, record inflation and severe pressure on household incomes.
According to analysts and rights groups, the currency has crashed to historic lows against the U.S. dollar, exacerbating the cost-of-living crisis that triggered mass anger among bazaar merchants, shopkeepers and students.
At least several people have been reported killed in clashes between protesters and security forces in multiple provinces — the deadliest unrest in Iran in years and the most serious since the widespread demonstrations of 2022–2023.
Iranian security officials have vowed to suppress unrest, warning that any illegal gatherings will be met with decisive force. Meanwhile, Iranian authorities have acknowledged only limited deaths, attributing one fatality to a member of the Basij paramilitary, though rights organisations dispute this account.
In response to Trump’s remarks, senior Iranian officials condemned the threat as unwarranted interference in domestic affairs. Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, wrote on social media that U.S. involvement would amount to regional destabilisation and jeopardise American interests.
Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian has sought to take a more conciliatory tone at home, acknowledging that economic mismanagement played a role in sparking the crisis and calling for internal dialogue to address the grievances of citizens.
The situation remains fluid, with protesters continuing to call for economic reforms and broader political change amid mounting frustration over the country’s economic trajectory and governmental policies.
Mali and Burkina Faso have announced restrictions on the entry of United States nationals, in a reciprocal response to Washington’s recent decision to place both West African countries on a travel restriction list.
The foreign ministries of Mali and Burkina Faso, in separate statements issued on Wednesday, said the measures were in reaction to the expansion of a U.S. travel ban by President Donald Trump, which targets nationals of nearly 40 countries based on nationality.
According to the statements, both governments described their actions as “equivalent measures” aimed at ensuring reciprocity in diplomatic and immigration relations between the affected countries and the United States.
Burkina Faso’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the country would henceforth apply “equivalent visa measures” to U.S. citizens seeking entry into its territory.
Similarly, Mali’s foreign ministry announced that, with immediate effect, it would impose “the same conditions and requirements on American nationals that the American authorities have imposed on Malian citizens entering the United States.”
The Malian authorities also expressed regret over the U.S. decision, noting that such a significant policy shift was taken “without the slightest prior consultation” with the affected countries.
The recent U.S. travel restrictions, announced on Dec. 17, were justified by the White House on security grounds, with U.S. officials stating that the ban targets foreigners who “intend to threaten” American citizens.
The list of affected countries reportedly includes Syria, holders of Palestinian Authority passports, and nationals of several African countries, among them Niger, Sierra Leone and South Sudan.
Mali and Burkina Faso, both governed by military juntas, are members of a Sahel confederation that also includes Niger.
Although Niger has not officially announced counter-measures, the country’s state news agency, citing a diplomatic source, reported last week that similar retaliatory steps had been agreed upon.
In addition to Mali and Burkina Faso, the U.S. travel restrictions also include partial limitations on citizens of other African countries, such as Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire and Senegal.
The restrictions come ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which will be jointly hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, raising concerns about potential implications for international travel and diplomatic relations.
China on Tuesday fired missiles and deployed dozens of fighter jets and naval vessels around Taiwan on the second day of large-scale live-fire military drills, further escalating tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
The Source reports that the two-day exercises, code-named “Justice Mission 2025,” are aimed at simulating a blockade of Taiwan’s key ports and conducting assaults on maritime and aerial targets.
Taiwan’s authorities have condemned the drills, describing them as “highly provocative and reckless,” warning that they undermine regional peace and stability.
China, which considers Taiwan a breakaway province, has consistently insisted that the island is part of its sovereign territory and has not ruled out the use of military force to achieve reunification.
AFP journalists stationed in Pingtan, a Chinese island located at the closest point to Taiwan’s main island, observed a volley of rockets launched into the air at about 9:00 a.m. local time on Tuesday. At least 10 missiles were reportedly fired in quick succession, leaving trails of white smoke and loud explosions that echoed across the area.
In a statement issued shortly after the launches, China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) confirmed that it had “conducted long-range live-fire drills in waters north of Taiwan Island and achieved the desired effects.”
The latest show of force follows recent large-scale arms sales to Taiwan by the United States, the island’s principal security partner, as well as comments by Japan’s Prime Minister suggesting that the use of force against Taiwan could provoke a military response from Tokyo.
China’s Foreign Minister, Wang Yi, said on Tuesday that Beijing would “forcefully counter” what he described as extensive U.S. weapons sales to Taiwan, adding that any attempt to obstruct China’s reunification efforts “will inevitably end in failure.”
Similarly, China’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Lin Jian, described the drills as a “punitive response to Taiwan independence separatist forces” and a necessary measure to safeguard China’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
In reaction, Taiwan’s President, Lai Ching-te, issued a strong condemnation, accusing Beijing of deliberately destabilising the region through military intimidation.
“This is a blatant provocation against regional security and the international order,” Lai said in a post on Facebook, stressing that Taiwan would not escalate the situation.
Extensive Military Deployment The PLA said it had deployed destroyers, frigates, fighter jets and bombers to carry out drills involving identification and verification, warning and expulsion procedures, simulated strikes, maritime assault operations, as well as anti-aircraft and anti-submarine warfare.
A statement from the PLA’s Eastern Theatre Command said the exercises, conducted in waters north and south of Taiwan, were designed to test sea-air coordination and integrated blockade and control capabilities.
China’s state broadcaster, CCTV, reported that a central focus of the drills was a simulated blockade of major Taiwanese ports, including Keelung in the north and Kaohsiung in the south.
Chinese authorities also released a map showing five designated zones around Taiwan where the drills were taking place, with the exercises scheduled to end at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday.
Impact on Taiwan
Taiwan’s authorities said some of the drill zones were within 12 nautical miles of its coastline, disrupting international shipping and aviation routes.
The island’s Civil Aviation Administration reported the cancellation of dozens of flights to the Kinmen and Matsu islands, affecting about 6,000 passengers, while more than 850 international flights were expected to experience delays.
Taiwan’s Ministry of Defence said it detected 130 Chinese military aircraft, 14 naval ships, and eight government vessels operating near the island within a 24-hour period ending at 6:00 a.m. Tuesday.
Taiwan’s coast guard confirmed it deployed 14 ships to monitor Chinese naval movements, adopting a “one-on-one shadowing approach” to deter the vessels. Public Reaction
Despite the heightened military activity, many residents in Taiwan appeared unfazed.
A fishmonger in Taipei, Chiang Sheng-ming, said repeated drills over the years had made people accustomed to such developments.
“If you stand your ground, there’s nothing to be afraid of,” he said. Another resident, Tseng
Chang-chih, expressed doubt that the situation would escalate into war, describing the drills as mere posturing.
China last conducted large-scale live-fire exercises around Taiwan in April, actions that were strongly criticised by Taipei.
Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump said he was not concerned about the drills, dismissing speculation that Chinese President Xi Jinping would order an invasion of Taiwan.
Source reports that tensions in the Taiwan Strait remain a major flashpoint in East Asian geopolitics, with implications for global security and international trade.
Global oil prices rebounded on Wednesday, rising above the 60-dollar-per-barrel mark, following a fresh escalation in United States action against Venezuela’s oil sector, despite lingering bearish pressures from geopolitical and economic developments.
Market data showed that oil prices gained more than two per cent after U.S. President Donald Trump ordered what he described as a “total and complete blockade” of all sanctioned tankers entering and leaving Venezuela, a move that heightened fears of supply disruptions from the South American oil producer.
As of midday trading on Wednesday, U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude rose by 2.44 per cent to trade at 56.62 dollars per barrel, while Brent crude climbed by 2.27 per cent to 60.26 dollars per barrel, according to figures from Oilprice.com.
President Trump, in a post on his Truth Social platform, described the Venezuelan government as a “foreign terrorist organisation,” justifying the blockade as part of efforts to curb alleged illicit activities linked to the administration of President Nicolás Maduro, including drug trafficking and human smuggling.
He further claimed that what he termed the “largest armada ever assembled in the history of South America” would continue to expand until Venezuela returns oil, land and assets he alleged belong to the United States.
Analysts noted that although the blockade targets only sanctioned vessels operating within Venezuela’s long-standing “shadow fleet,” the action could still disrupt a significant share of the country’s estimated 850,000 barrels per day crude exports, most of which are shipped to China.
However, Chevron’s licensed operations, which involve shipping Venezuelan crude oil to the United States, are expected to remain unaffected in the near term.
The rebound in prices followed a sharp decline earlier in the week, when crude prices slipped below 60 dollars per barrel on Tuesday, reaching their lowest levels since May. The earlier drop was driven by optimism surrounding possible Russia-Ukraine peace talks and weak economic data from China, which dampened market sentiment.
Reuters reported that Brent crude futures fell by 1.03 dollars, or about 1.7 per cent, to 59.53 dollars per barrel on Tuesday, while WTI crude declined by 1.06 dollars, or 1.9 per cent, to 55.76 dollars per barrel.
According to the report, the United States had offered NATO-style security guarantees for Kyiv, while European negotiators indicated that progress had been recorded in talks, raising hopes that an end to the Russia-Ukraine war could be approaching. Russia, however, maintained that it was unwilling to make territorial concessions, according to its state news agency, TASS.
Market indicators also reflected continued bearish sentiment, as the six-month Brent futures spread moved into contango for the first time since October. Analysts at Barclays projected that Brent crude would average 65 dollars per barrel in 2026, slightly above current forward curves, citing an already priced-in surplus of about 1.9 million barrels per day.
Additional pressure came from China, where new economic data showed factory output growth slowing to a 15-month low, while retail sales recorded their weakest growth since December 2022. An analyst at IG Markets, Tony Sycamore, was quoted by Reuters as saying that the data reinforced concerns about the ability of global demand to absorb recent increases in oil supply.
Although fears of oversupply were partly offset by the recent U.S. seizure of a sanctioned Venezuelan tanker, traders observed that ample floating storage and a surge in Chinese purchases of Venezuelan crude ahead of potential sanctions limited the immediate impact on prices.
Despite Wednesday’s rebound, analysts cautioned that broader bearish sentiment remains dominant in the oil market and that, without further concrete policy actions beyond the latest U.S. rhetoric, a sustained rally in oil prices may prove difficult to achieve.
President Donald Trump of the United States has signed a new proclamation imposing additional travel restrictions on foreign nationals, with Nigeria and 15 other countries added to the list of nations facing partial entry limitations into the U.S.
The decision, announced on Tuesday, is part of the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to tighten U.S. travel standards and strengthen border and migration controls.
Under the new proclamation, the countries newly subjected to partial travel restrictions are Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Côte d’Ivoire, Dominica, Gabon, The Gambia, Malawi, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Tonga, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
The proclamation also maintains full travel restrictions on the original 12 countries earlier classified as high-risk. These are Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.
In addition, full restrictions have now been extended to five more countries following recent U.S. security assessments. They include Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, South Sudan and Syria, as well as individuals holding travel documents issued by the Palestinian Authority.
According to the proclamation, Laos and Sierra Leone, which were previously under partial restrictions, have now been placed under full travel restrictions. Meanwhile, partial restrictions remain in force for Burundi, Cuba, Togo and Venezuela.
The U.S. government, however, lifted non-immigrant visa bans on Turkmenistan, citing what it described as improved cooperation with U.S. authorities, although restrictions on immigrant visas for Turkmen nationals remain in place.
The proclamation provides exemptions for lawful permanent residents of the United States, holders of valid visas, and certain visa categories, including diplomats and athletes. It also allows entry for individuals whose travel is deemed to be in the national interest of the United States.
Analysts say the latest measure forms part of President Trump’s renewed crackdown on migration and border security since his return to the White House. The administration has also intensified enforcement actions, including the deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to carry out arrests linked to immigration violations.
The inclusion of Nigeria and other African and Caribbean countries has already generated public debate, particularly over its potential impact on travel, education, business and family reunification for affected nationals.
The football authorities in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) have declined to comment on the controversy surrounding the eligibility of some of their players, following a petition submitted by the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA).
The development comes about one month after DR Congo defeated Nigeria on penalties in the final of the African play-off for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, held in Morocco.
The General Secretary of the NFF, Dr Mohammed Sanusi, confirmed on Tuesday that the federation had formally written to FIFA, alleging that DR Congo fielded ineligible players during the play-off match that eliminated Nigeria.
According to Sanusi, the petition centres on alleged violations of DR Congo’s domestic laws, which reportedly prohibit dual citizenship, contrary to the status of some players used during the encounter.
“We are waiting. The Congolese rules say you cannot have dual citizenship or nationality,” Sanusi said.
He explained that some of the players allegedly hold European passports alongside Congolese nationality.
“Wan-Bissaka has a European passport; some of them have French passports, others Dutch passports. The rules are very clear, and we have submitted our petition,” he added.
Sanusi noted that while FIFA cleared the players based on documentation presented, the world football governing body may have been misled.
“FIFA rules say once you have a passport of your country, you’re eligible, and that is why they were cleared. But our concern is that FIFA was deceived into clearing them.
“It is not FIFA’s responsibility to enforce Congo’s domestic regulations; FIFA acts based on what is submitted to it. What we are saying is that the process was fraudulent,” he said.
Another member of the NFF executive board, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the federation had done all that was required procedurally.
“NFF has done the needful. Their constitution does not allow dual citizenship, and about six to nine players had that status during the play-off. That is the loophole we are exploring.
“Our lawyers must have submitted the relevant documents to FIFA as well,” the official said.
It was gathered that although FIFA reportedly approved the players’ eligibility based on valid DR Congo passports, questions have been raised over whether they formally renounced their previous nationalities, as required by DR Congo’s constitution.
When contacted, the Chairperson of the Normalisation Committee overseeing football administration in DR Congo, Belinda Luntadila Nzuzi, declined to make substantive comments on the matter.
She said the country had not yet taken an official position.
Pressed on the credibility of the alleged breaches, Nzuzi maintained that no formal response had been issued by DR Congo football authorities.
Although FIFA has not officially named the players under investigation, reports indicate that the case involves Mario Stroeykens, Michel-Ange Balikwisha and Matthieu Epolo.
All three players previously represented Belgium at youth level before switching their international allegiance to DR Congo.
FIFA had publicly confirmed and approved their change of association between Nov. 11 and Nov. 13, 2025.
However, the current dispute reportedly focuses on issues of dual nationality and compliance with DR Congo’s domestic laws.
Of the three players, Balikwisha is the only one to have featured for DR Congo at senior level so far.
He made his debut against Nigeria during the World Cup play-off in November, coming on in extra time before scoring one of the penalties in the shoot-out.
DR Congo captain, Chancel Mbemba, subsequently converted the decisive kick, sending his team into the FIFA intercontinental play-offs at the expense of the Super Eagles.
DR Congo have been handed a bye into the final of the intercontinental play-off tournament and are scheduled to face the winner of the semi-final between New Caledonia and Jamaica by March 2026 in Mexico.
However, their participation at that stage could now be in doubt following the petition filed by the NFF.
The development has revived Nigeria’s hopes of qualifying for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, after the country narrowly missed out on the 2022 edition in Qatar.
DR Congo, meanwhile, have appeared at the FIFA World Cup only once, in 1974, when the country competed under the name Zaire.
Ukraine has accused Russia of carrying out a drone strike on a Turkish vessel transporting sunflower oil in the Black Sea, barely a day after a separate Russian attack caused a fire on another Turkish-owned ship at a Ukrainian port.
Ukraine’s Navy disclosed on Saturday that the Turkish vessel, VIVA, was hit by what it described as a targeted drone attack while en route to Egypt.
“Russia delivered a targeted strike using a drone against the Turkish vessel ‘VIVA’, which was sailing to Egypt with a cargo of sunflower oil,” the navy said in a statement posted on social media.
According to the navy, none of the 11 crew members aboard the ship was injured, and the vessel was able to continue its voyage after the incident.
The navy also released a video footage showing visible damage to the ship, including water on the deck and what appeared to be parts of a drone engine.
Reacting to the development, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned the attack, describing it as a threat to global food security.
“It was a strike against food security,” Zelensky said in his evening address.
He argued that attacking civilian ships carrying agricultural products, which he said had no connection to the war, amounted to “a direct challenge by Russia to the whole world.”
Zelensky added that Ukraine would consult with its international partners to determine an appropriate response.
“We will work with our partners to determine how to respond to this. There will be a response,” he said.
Reports indicated that the ship was sailing within Ukraine’s exclusive economic zone, using a designated grain corridor that runs close to Ukraine’s coastline and is meant to ensure safe passage for critical agricultural exports through the Black Sea.
The latest incident marked the second reported attack on a Turkish vessel within two days.
It also came shortly after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan called for an end to attacks on ports and energy infrastructure during face-to-face talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday.
Two United States soldiers and a civilian interpreter were killed on Saturday in central Syria after a suspected member of the Islamic State (IS) group opened fire on a joint U.S.–Syrian patrol, officials have said.
The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed the deaths in a statement posted on X, following earlier reports by Syrian state media that an attack in the ancient city of Palmyra had left American and Syrian personnel wounded.
CENTCOM said the incident was “an ambush by a lone ISIS gunman,” which resulted in the deaths of the two U.S. troops and the civilian interpreter, while three other American soldiers sustained injuries.
According to the command, the attacker was subsequently engaged and killed by security forces.
Pentagon spokesman, Mr Sean Parnell, said the soldiers were carrying out a “key leader engagement” in support of ongoing counterterrorism operations when the attack occurred.
Similarly, the U.S. envoy to Syria, Mr Tom Barrack, described the incident as an ambush targeting a joint patrol involving American forces and Syrian government personnel.
U.S. Defence Secretary, Mr Pete Hegseth, said the assailant was neutralised by partner forces, describing the attack as “savage.”
Parnell added that the identities of the deceased soldiers would be withheld until their families had been formally notified.
The attack is the first reported incident of its kind since Islamist-led forces overthrew Syria’s longtime ruler, Mr Bashar al-Assad, in December 2024, an event that led to renewed diplomatic and security cooperation between Damascus and Washington.
Earlier, Syria’s official news agency, SANA, quoted a security source as saying that several U.S. troops and two Syrian service members were wounded during the incident.
SANA reported that the soldiers were on a “joint field tour” in Palmyra, a city once under the control of the IS group during the height of its influence.
Palmyra is home to world-renowned ancient ruins designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, many of which were destroyed when the IS group occupied the area about a decade ago.
A Syrian military official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the shooting occurred “during a meeting between Syrian and American officers” at a military base in Palmyra.
A witness, who also requested anonymity, said he heard gunshots coming from inside the base.
However, a Pentagon official, speaking anonymously, told journalists that the attack took place in an area not fully under the control of the Syrian government.
In an interview with Syrian state television, Interior Ministry spokesman, Mr Anwar al-Baba, said there had been prior warnings from internal security forces to allied troops operating in the desert region about a possible IS infiltration.
He claimed that the international coalition forces did not adequately take the warnings into consideration.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitoring group with an extensive network inside Syria, said the meeting was part of a broader American strategy to strengthen its presence in the Syrian desert.
SANA also reported that helicopters evacuated the wounded personnel to the Al-Tanf military base in southern Syria, where U.S. troops are stationed as part of the Washington-led global coalition against the IS group.
It would be recalled that last month, during Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s visit to Washington, Syria formally joined the international coalition against IS.
The IS group seized large areas of Syrian and Iraqi territory in 2014 during Syria’s civil war before being territorially defeated in Syria in 2019.
Despite this, IS fighters are believed to still maintain a presence, particularly in Syria’s vast desert regions.
U.S. forces are currently deployed in Syria’s Kurdish-controlled northeast as well as at the Al-Tanf base near the Jordanian border.
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
